Restraint of Trade

A term in a contract that restricts a person’s right to exercise a trade or carry on business.

Background

“Restraint of trade” is a legal term hailing from contract law, where it denotes clauses or agreements that restrict an individual’s ability to engage in a profession, business, or trade. Such restrictions are precautionary measures to defend commercial or technical information or to protect business interests.

Historical Context

Historically, the principle of “restraint of trade” traces its origins to the common law era in the English legal system. Judges initially viewed such restraints unfavorably unless proven necessary and reasonable. Foundations laid in landmark cases continue to influence the doctrine in modern legal frameworks.

Definitions and Concepts

Restraint of trade applies mainly in contexts where two parties sign a contract that includes limitations on the ability of one party to conduct certain business activities. Common scenarios include:

  1. Sale of a Business: Sellers commit not to start a competing business immediately after the transaction.
  2. Employment Contracts: Employees agree not to work for competitors for certain periods post-employment.
  3. Non-Compete Clauses: These conditions avoid the transfer of sensitive information, protecting business interests.

Major Analytical Frameworks

Classical Economics

Classical economists view “restraint of trade” skeptically as it conflicts with the ideals of free competitive markets envisioned by Adam Smith and others.

Neoclassical Economics

Neoclassical schools focus on market efficiency. Restrictions can either ensure efficiency by protecting proprietary interests or hinder it by limiting market competition.

Keynesian Economics

Keynesians may analyze the broader economic impacts, such as potential unemployment due to restrictive agreements and adverse effects on aggregate demand.

Marxian Economics

Marxist theory would critique these restraints as mechanisms that maintain capital dominance over labor, inhibiting workers’ freedom for the preservation of capitalists’ interests.

Institutional Economics

Institutional economists examine how restraints are shaped by laws and societal norms, emphasizing the function of state regulations in balancing business and public interests.

Behavioral Economics

Behavioral experts would look into the psychological impact of such contracts and how cognitive biases may influence compliance and negotiation behavior.

Post-Keynesian Economics

Post-Keynesian theorists would scrutinize real-world implications of restraint clauses for labor markets and systemic inequalities.

Austrian Economics

Austrian schools assess these trade barriers as impediments to entrepreneurship and self-employment, thus arguing against them for undermining free-market operations.

Development Economics

From this perspective, development economists might study the role of restraints within dynamic economic environments, assessing effects on small businesses and emerging markets.

Monetarism

Monetarism would emphasize restraints’ effects on market dynamics, specifically focused on their impacts on business cycles and employment.

Comparative Analysis

The application and legal treatment of restraint of trade vary globally. In the UK, contracts in restraint of trade are void unless reasonable or in the public interest. The same principle exists in the US under common law but less stringently compared to European countries.

Case Studies

Significant cases in the realm of restraint of trade include:

  • Mitchel v. Reynolds (1711, UK): Established early standards for enforceability.
  • Centurion Health Management Co. v. National Basketball Ass’n: Restraints impacting competitive team movements in sports leagues.
  • Osmium Consulting Ltd v. Arrowhead Capital Ltd: Addressing non-compete agreements validity post-employment.

Suggested Books for Further Studies

  • “Non-Competition Covenants in the United States and the European Union” by Jim Secord
  • “The Law of Restraint of Trade” by John T. Amsden and Richard E. Turner
  • “Employment Covenants and Employee Competition” by Susan De Silva
  • Non-Compete Clause: Specific contractual term restricting future employment within defined parameters.
  • Conspiracy in Restraint of Trade: An agreement between parties to impede market competition unlawfully.
  • Trade Secret: Proprietary information used in business providing a competitive advantage.
Wednesday, July 31, 2024