Economic Convergence

Background

Economic convergence refers to the process by which economies tend to become more similar over time in key aspects such as per capita income, real growth rates, inflation rates, interest rates, methods of economic organization, and social policies. This concept includes not just aligning levels of economic performance but also encompasses broader economic structures and policies.

Historical Context

The idea of economic convergence traces back to classical and neoclassical economic theories but gained prominence in the 20th century. Post-World War II economic reconstruction and globalization accelerated fascination with convergence as discrepancies in global economic conditions became more apparent and rapidly changing.

Definitions and Concepts

Absolute Convergence: An assumption that poorer economies’ levels of per capita income grow faster than those in richer economies, thus eventually converging toward a similar level of per capita income.
Conditional Convergence: The premise that countries with different characteristics (e.g., savings rates, population growth) still tend to converge to their respective steady-state levels of per capita income.
Convergence Clubs: Groupings whereby convergence primarily occurs within specific subsets of countries, such as rich countries alone or mid-income developing countries, due to shared characteristics or policy frameworks.

Major Analytical Frameworks

Classical Economics

In classical economics, convergence is largely attributed to the mobility of labor and capital. Resources would flow from areas of low return to high return until returns optimize, thereby evening out discrepancies.

Neoclassical Economics

Neoclassical models, prominently articulated by Solow-Swan, predict convergence based on marginal returns to capital. As poorer countries have less capital, they tend to witness higher returns on new investments, had they equal access to technology and operate under similar institutional conditions.

Keynesian Economics

Keynesian models emphasize aggregate demand and the role of policy interventions to stabilize economies. Convergence can be influenced by governmental redistributive policies, public investments, and through coordinated macroeconomic policies.

Marxian Economics

Marxian views on convergence focus on how capitalist modes of production may lead to uniformity across global markets, albeit critiqued for reinforcing inequalities and overemphasis on labor exploitation.

Institutional Economics

Institutional theorists argue convergence is significantly dependent on the adoption of similar legal, political, and educational structures, which are critical for fostering comparable economic environments.

Behavioral Economics

Behavioral economics adds a psychological dimension, highlighting how shared behaviors, such as consumption patterns or risk attitudes, in differing economic environments might lead to convergence or divergences based on how closely they mirror those of more developed economies.

Post-Keynesian Economics

Post-Keynesian frameworks might critique the assumption of smooth adjustments and emphasize historical and structural factors that influence whether convergence can actually occur.

Austrian Economics

From an Austrian perspective, centralized planning and policy interventions might create apparent convergence metrics but may veil underlying inefficiencies or distort natural market corrections.

Development Economics

Development economics explores convergence in terms of structural transformation, capability enhancement, and the diffusion of innovations and skills among low-income countries striving to catch up with high-income countries.

Monetarism

Monetarist approaches analyze convergence with a focus on stable monetary policy, emphasizing how control of inflation and avoidance of excessive regulation can create a level playing field conducive to convergence.

Comparative Analysis

Empirical evidence on convergence is mixed. While some regions exhibit strong signs of convergence, others lag due to factors such as geopolitical instability, divergent policies, or structural challenges. The discrepancies in outcomes underscore the need to account for a diverse array of variables beyond economic metrics alone.

Case Studies

East Asian Tigers: Rapid industrialization and adoption of export-oriented policies in South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong demonstrate effective convergence with Western economies.
Southern Europe: The European Union’s cohesion funds and market integration have explored convergence effectively, although disparities remain.

Suggested Books for Further Studies

“Economic Growth” by David Weil
“The Convergence of Productivity: Cross-National Studies and Historical Evidence” by William J. Baumol, Richard R. Nelson, and Edward N. Wolff
“Empirical Growth Theory and the Transition Economies” by Gerhard Glomm and Fabio Méndez

Divergence: The opposite phenomenon where economies grow apart in terms of performance metrics.
Solow-Swan Model: A key neoclassical model explaining economic growth through capital accumulation, labor or population growth, and technological progress.
Catch-Up Effect: The hypothesis that poorer countries will grow more rapidly as they catch up with the income levels of richer countries, assuming similar conditions otherwise.
Club Convergence: Sub-group of countries that converge towards common economic metrics while diverging from the rest.

Making sense of economic