Background
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) refers to the strategic actions and resulting consequences implemented by multinational companies to avoid taxes. The companies exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules to artificially shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions, where their actual business activities are minimal or non-existent, thereby eroding the taxable base of high-tax jurisdictions.
Historical Context
BEPS gained widespread attention during the early 2010s as governments experienced increasing revenue shortfalls and economic inequality widened. The practices, while often legal, were seen as unfair and economically detrimental. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) began spearheading initiatives to counter these strategies and ensure tax equity among various jurisdictions.
Definitions and Concepts
Base Erosion
Base erosion involves actions by companies that reduce the taxable income in high-tax jurisdictions where economic activities actually take place.
Profit Shifting
Profit shifting is the strategic financial movement of profits from higher-tax jurisdictions to lower-tax jurisdictions.
Transfer Pricing
Transfer pricing refers to the prices at which services, goods, and intangible property are traded between related entities within a multinational enterprise. Manipulating these prices enables profit shifting.
Major Analytical Frameworks
Classical Economics
Classical economics largely overlooks issues pertaining to BEPS, focusing more on broad fiscal policies and individual tax liabilities.
Neoclassical Economics
While neoclassical economics analyzes market equilibrium and efficiency, it begins to touch on BEPS when studying corporate behavior and tax incidence, recognizing the distortions created by differential tax regimes.
Keynesian Economic
Keynesian economics typically emphasizes government intervention to address economic downturns. In the context of BEPS, Keynesians advocate for international cooperation and government measures to close tax loopholes and ensure corporate taxes contribute to public spending.
Marxian Economics
Marxian economics highlights the inherent contradictions and inequalities perpetuated by Capitalism. From this perspective, BEPS exemplifies how multinationals exploit regulatory environments to the detriment of nation-states and state revenues.
Institutional Economics
Institutional economics focuses on the role that regulatory and societal norms play in shaping economic behavior. It highlights the need for robust international institutional frameworks to curb BEPS.
Behavioral Economics
Behavioral economics examines the decision-making processes of companies, emphasizing how cognitive biases and strategic considerations fuel BEPS activities above purely rational calculations.
Post-Keynesian Economics
This framework stresses financial stability and equitable growth. Post-Keynesians view BEPS as a destabilizing factor and uphold the rationale for stricter regulatory measures against tax avoidance.
Austrian Economics
Austrians advocate minimal government intervention and may argue that jurisdictions differ in tax policies due to competition for attracting capital, seeing BEPS as a natural outcome of these competitive differences.
Development Economics
Developmental economists view BEPS as a major issue for developing countries, eroding their tax bases and impeding sustainable growth by losing critical revenue needed for development.
Monetarism
Monetarist theories, which focus on the control of money supply, suggest improving tax compliance and system simplification but often offer limited concrete steps in addressing BEPS practices directly.
Comparative Analysis
Techniques and aggressiveness in BEPS can greatly vary by industry and jurisdiction. The contrasting tax policies of nations create unique BEPS strategies distorting competition and value creation merits.
Case Studies
High-profile cases such as those involving Apple, Google, and Starbucks have revealed common strategies employed, such as assigning intellectual property to subsidiaries in low-tax jurisdictions or using intercompany loans to take advantage of high-deductibility interests.
Suggested Books for Further Studies
- “The Hidden Wealth of Nations” by Gabriel Zucman
- “Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion” by Dhammika Dharmapala
- “Capital without Borders: Wealth Managers and the One Percent” by Brooke Harrington
Related Terms with Definitions
Transfer Pricing: The pricing of goods, services, and intangibles traded between related entities within a multinational enterprise which can be manipulated for BEPS.
Tax Haven: A jurisdiction known for low or zero taxation, minimal disclosure rules, and financial secrecy, making it favorable for profit shifting.
Double Taxation Agreement (DTA): Treaties between two countries aiming to avoid taxation of the same income in both countries but often exploited for dual non-taxation.
Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements: Strategies exploiting differences in tax treatment of entities or instruments across jurisdictions to achieve non-taxation or double deductions.
